ss AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core testing with a Gigabyte TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI (F6 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB on Ubuntu 23.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core @ 2.90GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI (F6 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 128GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB (1750/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-32-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.0, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.2 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.49), Compiler: GCC 12.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 b: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core @ 2.90GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI (F6 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 128GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB (1750/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-32-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.0, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.2 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.49), Compiler: GCC 12.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Bumper Beam Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 84.41 |==================================================================== b . 84.34 |==================================================================== OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Chrysler Neon 1M Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 669.43 |=================================================================== b . 667.48 |=================================================================== OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Cell Phone Drop Test Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 41.69 |=================================================================== b . 42.15 |==================================================================== OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Bird Strike on Windshield Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 149.45 |=================================================================== b . 147.39 |================================================================== OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Rubber O-Ring Seal Installation Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 77.25 |==================================================================== b . 77.46 |==================================================================== OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: INIVOL and Fluid Structure Interaction Drop Container Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 205.54 |=================================================================== b . 205.79 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 138860 |================================================================== b . 140063 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 114.52 |=================================================================== b . 114.75 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 341127 |=================================================================== b . 340306 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 121.59 |=================================================================== b . 119.36 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 537631 |================================================================== b . 542506 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 122.72 |=================================================================== b . 120.19 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 274352 |=================================================================== b . 275801 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 64.02 |==================================================================== b . 63.21 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 672694 |=================================================================== b . 662927 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 65.17 |================================================================= b . 68.04 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1031656 |================================================================== b . 1039477 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 69.91 |==================================================================== b . 69.04 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 645287 |================================================================== b . 652854 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 27.81 |==================================================================== b . 27.73 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 643502 |=================================================================== b . 631833 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 108.02 |=================================================================== b . 107.94 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1517424 |================================================================= b . 1537118 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 30.39 |==================================================================== b . 29.89 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1495013 |================================================================== b . 1501141 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 120.06 |=================================================================== b . 114.27 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2275886 |================================================================= b . 2297049 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 32.37 |==================================================================== b . 32.20 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2321581 |================================================================== b . 2259297 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 120.08 |================================================================ b . 125.59 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 973754 |=================================================================== b . 972755 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 18.69 |==================================================================== b . 18.68 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 995525 |=================================================================== b . 993837 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 71.47 |==================================================================== b . 71.60 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2216001 |================================================================== b . 2201098 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 21.06 |==================================================================== b . 21.21 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2260791 |================================================================== b . 2258992 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 79.98 |==================================================================== b . 80.03 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3233810 |================================================================== b . 3232172 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 23.20 |==================================================================== b . 23.19 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3247838 |================================================================ b . 3343444 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 89.44 |==================================================================== b . 85.04 |================================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 12936851 |================================================================= b . 12815733 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 127.45 |================================================================== b . 129.65 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 28747644 |================================================================= b . 27376957 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 131.83 |============================================================= b . 144.97 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 37537843 |================================================================= b . 37825113 |================================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 170.46 |=================================================================== b . 167.51 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 22370735 |================================================================= b . 22217285 |================================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 77.77 |==================================================================== b . 75.86 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 43316984 |================================================================= b . 42901820 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 98.33 |=================================================================== b . 99.52 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 58181053 |================================================================= b . 53081259 |=========================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 114.99 |============================================================ b . 128.61 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 41443848 |================================================================= b . 40073240 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 43.93 |================================================================== b . 45.09 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 40624966 |================================================================= b . 39325626 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 158.96 |================================================================ b . 166.30 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 63651860 |================================================================= b . 55400344 |========================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 72.16 |=============================================================== b . 78.41 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 61872691 |================================================================= b . 55869036 |=========================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 258.09 |============================================================== b . 277.39 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 70860555 |================================================================= b . 61459240 |======================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 104.98 |============================================================= b . 115.66 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 72061515 |================================================================= b . 56041201 |=================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 349.03 |========================================================= b . 407.54 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 52131675 |================================================================= b . 47371980 |=========================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 35.49 |=============================================================== b . 38.10 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 49784515 |================================================================= b . 46320172 |============================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 144.27 |=================================================================== b . 142.54 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 69872259 |================================================================= b . 54871808 |=================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 67.41 |======================================================= b . 82.61 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 69546682 |================================================================= b . 55539783 |==================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 259.06 |===================================================== b . 326.93 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 76882032 |================================================================= b . 54478575 |============================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 97.11 |================================================== b . 129.96 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 69512491 |================================================================= b . 53681754 |================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 409.48 |================================================= b . 565.19 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 37037 |==================================================================== b . 36963 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.027 |==================================================================== b . 0.027 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 695 |====================================================================== b . 692 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 1.440 |==================================================================== b . 1.444 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1566927 |================================================================ b . 1605981 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.032 |==================================================================== b . 0.031 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1788145 |================================================================== b . 1776896 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.056 |==================================================================== b . 0.056 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 2166017 |================================================================== b . 2040871 |============================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.115 |================================================================ b . 0.122 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 688 |====================================================================== b . 689 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 72.64 |==================================================================== b . 72.60 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 2280139 |================================================================== b . 2253147 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.219 |=================================================================== b . 0.222 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 2234154 |================================================================== b . 2223092 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.358 |==================================================================== b . 0.360 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 34002 |=================================================================== b . 34459 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.029 |==================================================================== b . 0.029 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 672 |====================================================================== b . 666 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 148.90 |================================================================== b . 150.08 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 2148715 |============================================================== b . 2274631 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.465 |==================================================================== b . 0.440 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 643 |===================================================================== b . 654 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 388.92 |=================================================================== b . 382.49 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 588 |====================================================================== b . 571 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 850.10 |================================================================= b . 875.13 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 537 |====================================================================== b . 513 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 1490.88 |=============================================================== b . 1558.20 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 436 |====================================================================== b . 426 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 2.292 |================================================================== b . 2.348 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1470256 |================================================================= b . 1489511 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.034 |==================================================================== b . 0.034 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 506 |====================================================================== b . 491 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 1976.00 |================================================================ b . 2038.24 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1685152 |================================================================= b . 1710601 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.059 |==================================================================== b . 0.058 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 2035616 |================================================================== b . 2010745 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.123 |=================================================================== b . 0.124 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 4642 |===================================================================== b . 4281 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 10.77 |=============================================================== b . 11.68 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 2061938 |================================================================== b . 1944283 |============================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.242 |================================================================ b . 0.257 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 2055807 |================================================================== b . 2029971 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.389 |=================================================================== b . 0.394 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 5937 |===================================================================== b . 5272 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 16.84 |============================================================ b . 18.97 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 2003637 |================================================================== b . 1984743 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.499 |=================================================================== b . 0.504 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 6788 |===================================================================== b . 5977 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 36.83 |============================================================ b . 41.83 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 7504 |===================================================================== b . 6530 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 66.63 |=========================================================== b . 76.57 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 7723 |===================================================================== b . 6870 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 103.58 |============================================================ b . 116.45 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 7835 |===================================================================== b . 6817 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 127.63 |========================================================== b . 146.69 |===================================================================