Steam Deck LCD

AMD Custom APU 0405 testing with a Valve Jupiter v1 (F7A0119 BIOS) and AMD Custom GPU 0405 1GB on SteamOS rolling via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2311270-NE-STEAMDECK02
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Steam Deck LCD
November 27 2023
  5 Hours, 14 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Steam Deck LCD

Processor: AMD Custom APU 0405 @ 2.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Valve Jupiter v1 (F7A0119 BIOS), Chipset: AMD VanGogh Root Complex, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 512GB Phison ESMP512GKB4C3-E13TS + 1000GB RTL9210B-CG, Graphics: AMD Custom GPU 0405 1GB (1600/687MHz), Audio: AMD Rembrandt Radeon HD Audio, Monitor: ANX7530 U, Network: Realtek RTL8822CE 802.11ac PCIe

OS: SteamOS rolling, Kernel: 6.1.52-valve9-1-neptune-61 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.27.5, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.1.3 (git-58f7632462) (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.54), File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x800

Kernel Notes: amdgpu.gttsize=8128 spi_amd.speed_dev=1 - Transparent Huge Pages: always
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0x8900201
Graphics Notes: GLAMOR - BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 1024 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-AMDAerithJ-004
Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.19+7)
Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Vulnerable + spec_rstack_overflow: Vulnerable + spec_store_bypass: Vulnerable + spectre_v1: Vulnerable: __user pointer sanitization and usercopy barriers only; no swapgs barriers + spectre_v2: Vulnerable IBPB: disabled STIBP: disabled PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Steam Deck LCDOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteAMD Custom APU 0405 @ 2.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads)Valve Jupiter v1 (F7A0119 BIOS)AMD VanGogh Root Complex16GB512GB Phison ESMP512GKB4C3-E13TS + 1000GB RTL9210B-CGAMD Custom GPU 0405 1GB (1600/687MHz)AMD Rembrandt Radeon HD AudioANX7530 URealtek RTL8822CE 802.11ac PCIeSteamOS rolling6.1.52-valve9-1-neptune-61 (x86_64)KDE Plasma 5.27.5X Server 1.21.1.34.6 Mesa 23.1.3 (git-58f7632462) (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.54)ext41280x800ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerOpenGLFile-SystemScreen ResolutionSteam Deck LCD BenchmarksSystem Logs- amdgpu.gttsize=8128 spi_amd.speed_dev=1 - Transparent Huge Pages: always- Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0x8900201 - GLAMOR - BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 1024 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-AMDAerithJ-004 - OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.19+7)- gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Vulnerable + spec_rstack_overflow: Vulnerable + spec_store_bypass: Vulnerable + spectre_v1: Vulnerable: __user pointer sanitization and usercopy barriers only; no swapgs barriers + spectre_v2: Vulnerable IBPB: disabled STIBP: disabled PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Steam Deck LCDcyberpunk2077: 1280 x 800 - Lowcyberpunk2077: 1280 x 800 - Mediumcyberpunk2077: 1280 x 800 - Highcyberpunk2077: 1280 x 800 - Ultraf122: 1280 x 800 - Lowf122: 1280 x 800 - Mediumf122: 1280 x 800 - Highf122: 1280 x 800 - Ultra Highunigine-valley: 1280 x 800 - Fullscreen - OpenGLunigine-super: 1280 x 800 - Fullscreen - Low - OpenGLunigine-super: 1280 x 800 - Fullscreen - Medium - OpenGLxonotic: 1280 x 800 - Lowxonotic: 1280 x 800 - Highxonotic: 1280 x 800 - Ultraxonotic: 1280 x 800 - Ultimateunvanquished: 1280 x 800 - Mediumunvanquished: 1280 x 800 - Highunvanquished: 1280 x 800 - Ultratesseract: 1280 x 8003dmark: 1280 x 800gravitymark: 1280 x 800 - Vulkanblender: BMW27 - CPU-Onlyjava-scimark2: Compositedacapobench: Eclipsedacapobench: Jythondacapobench: GraphChidacapobench: jMonkeyEngineoidn: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - CPU-Onlyembree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragonembree: Pathtracer ISPC - Crownopenradioss: Bird Strike on Windshieldopenradioss: Cell Phone Drop Testopenradioss: Bumper BeamSteam Deck LCD46.8741.5731.6926.729385624458.820164.036332.7829365225.4767448231.2506995193.7873762171.0168.6167.5226.187896.2033.4423.341592.38172107440580270520.134.00273.1550740.55270.47421.10OpenBenchmarking.org

Cyberpunk 2077

This is a benchmark of Cyberpunk 2077 running under Steam Play (Proton) on Linux. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that the game is already purchased/installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized scene. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Setting: LowSteam Deck LCD1122334455SE +/- 0.15, N = 346.87MIN: 15.08 / MAX: 78.91
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Setting: LowSteam Deck LCD0.80331.60662.40993.21324.01653.57
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.113.116.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCyberpunk 2077CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 1510 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Setting: MediumSteam Deck LCD918273645SE +/- 0.06, N = 341.57MIN: 12.21 / MAX: 85.2
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Setting: MediumSteam Deck LCD0.70921.41842.12762.83683.5463.152
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.113.216.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCyberpunk 2077CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 1491 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Setting: HighSteam Deck LCD714212835SE +/- 0.05, N = 331.69MIN: 10.49 / MAX: 63.8
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Setting: HighSteam Deck LCD0.54141.08281.62422.16562.7072.406
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.213.216.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCyberpunk 2077CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 1519 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Setting: UltraSteam Deck LCD612182430SE +/- 0.07, N = 326.72MIN: 8.67 / MAX: 65.61
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Setting: UltraSteam Deck LCD0.52251.0451.56752.092.61252.322
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.111.518.6OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCyberpunk 2077CPU Power Consumption Monitor6121824301. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 1745 Joules per run.

F1 22

This is a benchmark of F1 22 (2022) running under Steam Play (Proton) on Linux. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that the game is already purchased/installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterF1 22Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Preset: LowSteam Deck LCD20406080100SE +/- 0.58, N = 393MIN: 77 / MAX: 116

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterF1 22Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Preset: Low - Total Frame TimeSteam Deck LCD612182430Min: 4.88 / Avg: 10.79 / Max: 27.5
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.113.616.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterF1 22CPU Power Consumption Monitor510152025

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterF1 22Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Preset: MediumSteam Deck LCD20406080100SE +/- 0.33, N = 385MIN: 69 / MAX: 104

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterF1 22Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Total Frame TimeSteam Deck LCD612182430Min: 5 / Avg: 11.62 / Max: 24.01
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.213.516.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterF1 22CPU Power Consumption Monitor510152025

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterF1 22Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Preset: HighSteam Deck LCD1428425670SE +/- 0.58, N = 362MIN: 50 / MAX: 76

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterF1 22Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Preset: High - Total Frame TimeSteam Deck LCD918273645Min: 8.31 / Avg: 15.84 / Max: 45.88
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.113.516.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterF1 22CPU Power Consumption Monitor510152025

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterF1 22Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Preset: Ultra HighSteam Deck LCD1020304050SE +/- 0.33, N = 344MIN: 34 / MAX: 53

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterF1 22Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Preset: Ultra High - Total Frame TimeSteam Deck LCD918273645Min: 8.83 / Avg: 21.95 / Max: 44.3
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.113.416.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterF1 22CPU Power Consumption Monitor510152025

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL 3 core profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLSteam Deck LCD1326395265SE +/- 0.25, N = 358.82
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLSteam Deck LCD0.90141.80282.70423.60564.5074.006
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.214.716.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 2917 Joules per run.

Unigine Superposition

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Superposition demo for the Unigine engine, released in 2017. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGLSteam Deck LCD1428425670SE +/- 0.06, N = 364.0MAX: 90.1
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGLSteam Deck LCD1.08432.16863.25294.33725.42154.819
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.213.315.6OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 2621 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGLSteam Deck LCD816243240SE +/- 0.00, N = 336MAX: 47.8
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGLSteam Deck LCD0.56271.12541.68812.25082.81352.501
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.114.416.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 2822 Joules per run.

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game for this open-source first person shooter title. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: LowSteam Deck LCD70140210280350SE +/- 0.52, N = 3332.78MIN: 207 / MAX: 523
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: LowSteam Deck LCD102030405045.31
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.17.38.8OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6CPU Power Consumption Monitor36912151. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 898 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: HighSteam Deck LCD50100150200250SE +/- 0.87, N = 3225.48MIN: 145 / MAX: 412
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: HighSteam Deck LCD81624324036.87
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.06.110.5OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6CPU Power Consumption Monitor481216201. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 1056 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: UltraSteam Deck LCD50100150200250SE +/- 2.43, N = 5231.25MIN: 135 / MAX: 407
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: UltraSteam Deck LCD71421283531.37
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.07.412.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6CPU Power Consumption Monitor481216201. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 1243 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: UltimateSteam Deck LCD4080120160200SE +/- 0.52, N = 3193.79MIN: 75 / MAX: 371
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: UltimateSteam Deck LCD61218243024.09
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.28.012.6OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6CPU Power Consumption Monitor481216201. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 1596 Joules per run.

Unvanquished

Unvanquished is a modern fork of the Tremulous first person shooter. Unvanquished is powered by the Daemon engine, a combination of the ioquake3 (id Tech 3) engine with the graphically-beautiful XreaL engine. Unvanquished supports a modern OpenGL 3 renderer and other advanced graphics features for this open-source, cross-platform shooter game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.54Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: MediumSteam Deck LCD4080120160200SE +/- 0.35, N = 3171.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.54Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: MediumSteam Deck LCD81624324035.40
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD1.64.88.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.54CPU Power Consumption Monitor36912151. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 251 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.54Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: HighSteam Deck LCD4080120160200SE +/- 0.99, N = 3168.6
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.54Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: HighSteam Deck LCD81624324034.85
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.04.88.3OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.54CPU Power Consumption Monitor36912151. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 255 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.54Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: UltraSteam Deck LCD4080120160200SE +/- 0.32, N = 3167.5
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.54Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: UltraSteam Deck LCD71421283530.45
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.05.59.6OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.54CPU Power Consumption Monitor4.428.8413.2617.6822.11. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 297 Joules per run.

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1280 x 800Steam Deck LCD50100150200250SE +/- 2.54, N = 3226.19
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1280 x 800Steam Deck LCD81624324035.89
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.16.312.3OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12CPU Power Consumption Monitor481216201. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 237 Joules per run.

3DMark Wild Life Extreme

This test profile only automates the vendor build of 3DMark with its command-line / JSON support. If you do not have a licensed copy of the necessary 3DMark binaries in your Phoronix Test Suite download cache on your system, this test profile will not do anything and simply fail. You must have already obtained the proper licensed binaries from UL for this test profile to work -- this test profile simply automates the firing of the 3DMark benchmark at your desired resolution and capturing the results within the Phoronix Test Suite while you must already have the necessary 3DMark files on your system. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Better3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1Resolution: 1280 x 800Steam Deck LCD20406080100SE +/- 0.12, N = 396.20
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1Resolution: 1280 x 800Steam Deck LCD2468106.779
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.114.216.7OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is Better3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 984 Joules per run.

GravityMark

GravityMark is a cross-API, cross-platform GPU accelerated benchmark developed by Tellusim. GravityMark aims to exploit the performance of modern GPUs and render hundreds of thousands of objects in real-time all using GPU acceleration. GravityMark supports a variety of graphics rendering APIs and optionally supports accelerated ray-tracing. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterGravityMark 1.82Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Renderer: VulkanSteam Deck LCD816243240SE +/- 0.12, N = 333.4
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterGravityMark 1.82Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Renderer: VulkanSteam Deck LCD0.6681.3362.0042.6723.342.969
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.111.215.4OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGravityMark 1.82CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 1969 Joules per run.

Blender

Blender is an open-source 3D creation and modeling software project. This test is of Blender's Cycles performance with various sample files. GPU computing via NVIDIA OptiX and NVIDIA CUDA is currently supported as well as HIP for AMD Radeon GPUs and Intel oneAPI for Intel Graphics. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 4.0Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-OnlySteam Deck LCD90180270360450SE +/- 0.37, N = 3423.34
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterBlender 4.0CPU Power Consumption MonitorSteam Deck LCD48121620Min: 2.12 / Avg: 15.81 / Max: 16.691. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 6767 Joules per run.

Java SciMark

This test runs the Java version of SciMark 2, which is a benchmark for scientific and numerical computing developed by programmers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. This benchmark is made up of Fast Foruier Transform, Jacobi Successive Over-relaxation, Monte Carlo, Sparse Matrix Multiply, and dense LU matrix factorization benchmarks. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.2Computational Test: CompositeSteam Deck LCD30060090012001500SE +/- 13.92, N = 81592.38
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops Per Watt, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.2Computational Test: CompositeSteam Deck LCD50100150200250249.45
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.16.48.9OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterJava SciMark 2.2CPU Power Consumption Monitor36912151. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 201 Joules per run.

DaCapo Benchmark

This test runs the DaCapo Benchmarks written in Java and intended to test system/CPU performance of various popular real-world Java workloads. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 23.11Java Test: EclipseSteam Deck LCD4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 167.96, N = 317210
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.011.015.9OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 23.11CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 817 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 23.11Java Test: JythonSteam Deck LCD16003200480064008000SE +/- 9.17, N = 37440
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.17.815.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 23.11CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 254 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 23.11Java Test: GraphChiSteam Deck LCD12002400360048006000SE +/- 62.48, N = 35802
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.18.213.7OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 23.11CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 269 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 23.11Java Test: jMonkeyEngineSteam Deck LCD15003000450060007500SE +/- 6.69, N = 37052
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.12.97.6OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 23.11CPU Power Consumption Monitor36912151. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 77 Joules per run.

Intel Open Image Denoise

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages / Sec, More Is BetterIntel Open Image Denoise 2.1Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-OnlySteam Deck LCD0.02930.05860.08790.11720.1465SE +/- 0.00, N = 30.13
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages / Sec Per Watt, More Is BetterIntel Open Image Denoise 2.1Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-OnlySteam Deck LCD0.00180.00360.00540.00720.0090.008
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.115.716.4OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterIntel Open Image Denoise 2.1CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 3589 Joules per run.

OSPRay Studio

Intel OSPRay Studio is an open-source, interactive visualization and ray-tracing software package. OSPRay Studio makes use of Intel OSPRay, a portable ray-tracing engine for high-performance, high-fidelity visualizations. OSPRay builds off Intel's Embree and Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC) components as part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU

Steam Deck LCD: The test run did not produce a result. E: -- LOG(0): Value passed to --benchmark_min_time should have a suffix. Eg., `30s` for 30-seconds.ospStudio internal error: 'Node::valueAs(): Incorrect type queried for Any

Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU

Steam Deck LCD: The test run did not produce a result. E: -- LOG(0): Value passed to --benchmark_min_time should have a suffix. Eg., `30s` for 30-seconds.ospStudio internal error: 'Node::valueAs(): Incorrect type queried for Any

Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU

Steam Deck LCD: The test run did not produce a result. E: -- LOG(0): Value passed to --benchmark_min_time should have a suffix. Eg., `30s` for 30-seconds.ospStudio internal error: 'Node::valueAs(): Incorrect type queried for Any

Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU

Steam Deck LCD: The test run did not produce a result. E: -- LOG(0): Value passed to --benchmark_min_time should have a suffix. Eg., `30s` for 30-seconds.ospStudio internal error: 'Node::valueAs(): Incorrect type queried for Any

Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU

Steam Deck LCD: The test run did not produce a result. E: -- LOG(0): Value passed to --benchmark_min_time should have a suffix. Eg., `30s` for 30-seconds.ospStudio internal error: 'Node::valueAs(): Incorrect type queried for Any

Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU

Steam Deck LCD: The test run did not produce a result. E: -- LOG(0): Value passed to --benchmark_min_time should have a suffix. Eg., `30s` for 30-seconds.ospStudio internal error: 'Node::valueAs(): Incorrect type queried for Any

Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU

Steam Deck LCD: The test run did not produce a result. E: -- LOG(0): Value passed to --benchmark_min_time should have a suffix. Eg., `30s` for 30-seconds.ospStudio internal error: 'Node::valueAs(): Incorrect type queried for Any

Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU

Steam Deck LCD: The test run did not produce a result. E: -- LOG(0): Value passed to --benchmark_min_time should have a suffix. Eg., `30s` for 30-seconds.ospStudio internal error: 'Node::valueAs(): Incorrect type queried for Any

Embree

Intel Embree is a collection of high-performance ray-tracing kernels for execution on CPUs (and GPUs via SYCL) and supporting instruction sets such as SSE, AVX, AVX2, and AVX-512. Embree also supports making use of the Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterEmbree 4.3Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian DragonSteam Deck LCD0.90061.80122.70183.60244.503SE +/- 0.0027, N = 34.0027MIN: 3.99 / MAX: 4.06
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterEmbree 4.3Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian DragonSteam Deck LCD0.05760.11520.17280.23040.2880.256
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.015.616.6OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterEmbree 4.3CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 2969 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterEmbree 4.3Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: CrownSteam Deck LCD0.70991.41982.12972.83963.5495SE +/- 0.0032, N = 33.1550MIN: 3.13 / MAX: 3.21
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterEmbree 4.3Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: CrownSteam Deck LCD0.04520.09040.13560.18080.2260.201
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.115.716.6OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterEmbree 4.3CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 3766 Joules per run.

OpenRadioss

OpenRadioss is an open-source AGPL-licensed finite element solver for dynamic event analysis OpenRadioss is based on Altair Radioss and open-sourced in 2022. This open-source finite element solver is benchmarked with various example models available from https://www.openradioss.org/models/ and https://github.com/OpenRadioss/ModelExchange/tree/main/Examples. This test is currently using a reference OpenRadioss binary build offered via GitHub. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenRadioss 2023.09.15Model: Bird Strike on WindshieldSteam Deck LCD160320480640800SE +/- 1.52, N = 3740.55
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterOpenRadioss 2023.09.15CPU Power Consumption MonitorSteam Deck LCD48121620Min: 2.12 / Avg: 15.85 / Max: 16.541. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 11844 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenRadioss 2023.09.15Model: Cell Phone Drop TestSteam Deck LCD60120180240300SE +/- 0.42, N = 3270.47
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck LCD2.115.516.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterOpenRadioss 2023.09.15CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 4361 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenRadioss 2023.09.15Model: Bumper BeamSteam Deck LCD90180270360450SE +/- 0.90, N = 3421.10
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterOpenRadioss 2023.09.15CPU Power Consumption MonitorSteam Deck LCD48121620Min: 2.13 / Avg: 15.8 / Max: 16.181. Steam Deck LCD: Approximate power consumption of 6740 Joules per run.

Meta Performance Per Watts

OpenBenchmarking.orgPerformance Per Watts, More Is BetterMeta Performance Per WattsPerformance Per WattsSteam Deck LCD142842567060.32

CPU Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWattsCPU Power Consumption MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System MonitoringSteam Deck LCD612182430Min: 1.63 / Avg: 12.52 / Max: 24.9

Steam Deck LCD

Processor: AMD Custom APU 0405 @ 2.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Valve Jupiter v1 (F7A0119 BIOS), Chipset: AMD VanGogh Root Complex, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 512GB Phison ESMP512GKB4C3-E13TS + 1000GB RTL9210B-CG, Graphics: AMD Custom GPU 0405 1GB (1600/687MHz), Audio: AMD Rembrandt Radeon HD Audio, Monitor: ANX7530 U, Network: Realtek RTL8822CE 802.11ac PCIe

OS: SteamOS rolling, Kernel: 6.1.52-valve9-1-neptune-61 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.27.5, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.1.3 (git-58f7632462) (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.54), File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x800

Kernel Notes: amdgpu.gttsize=8128 spi_amd.speed_dev=1 - Transparent Huge Pages: always
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0x8900201
Graphics Notes: GLAMOR - BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 1024 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-AMDAerithJ-004
Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.19+7)
Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Vulnerable + spec_rstack_overflow: Vulnerable + spec_store_bypass: Vulnerable + spectre_v1: Vulnerable: __user pointer sanitization and usercopy barriers only; no swapgs barriers + spectre_v2: Vulnerable IBPB: disabled STIBP: disabled PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Testing initiated at 27 November 2023 15:18 by user deck.