new week AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX 24-Cores testing with a ASUS Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI (1201 BIOS) and ASUS NVIDIA NV106 2GB on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX 24-Cores @ 3.80GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI (1201 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 8 x 16GB DDR4-2133MT/s Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16, Disk: 2048GB SOLIDIGM SSDPFKKW020X7, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA NV106 2GB, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Monitor: VA2431, Network: 2 x Intel X550 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.5.0-26-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.0, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 23.2.1-1ubuntu3, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 b: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX 24-Cores @ 3.80GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI (1201 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 8 x 16GB DDR4-2133MT/s Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16, Disk: 2048GB SOLIDIGM SSDPFKKW020X7, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA NV106 2GB, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Monitor: VA2431, Network: 2 x Intel X550 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.5.0-26-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.0, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 23.2.1-1ubuntu3, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 40.17 |==================================================================== b . 39.95 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 15.64 |==================================================================== b . 15.63 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 31.71 |=================================================================== b . 31.99 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 31.91 |==================================================================== b . 31.89 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 31.64 |==================================================================== b . 31.74 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 12.30 |==================================================================== b . 12.26 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 31.90 |==================================================================== b . 31.54 |=================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 12.27 |=================================================================== b . 12.38 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 12.29 |==================================================================== b . 12.33 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 12.32 |==================================================================== b . 12.36 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 9.42 |===================================================================== b . 9.44 |===================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 6.82 |==================================================================== b . 6.96 |===================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 6.93 |===================================================================== b . 6.95 |===================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 6.80 |==================================================================== b . 6.85 |===================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 6.90 |===================================================================== b . 6.92 |===================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 10.70 |=================================================================== b . 10.87 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 101.63 |=================================================================== b . 102.11 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 118.38 |=================================================================== b . 117.25 |================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 134.28 |=================================================================== b . 133.67 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 12.73 |==================================================================== b . 12.29 |================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 9.60 |===================================================================== b . 9.66 |===================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 152.96 |=================================================================== b . 152.53 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 60.85 |==================================================================== b . 60.80 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 18.91 |================================================================ b . 20.09 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 61.27 |==================================================================== b . 60.80 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 20.17 |==================================================================== b . 19.99 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 58.15 |=================================================================== b . 59.03 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 19.70 |==================================================================== b . 19.54 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 57.87 |==================================================================== b . 57.36 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 19.48 |==================================================================== b . 19.43 |==================================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_only - Threads: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 17560 |==================================================================== b . 17494 |==================================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_only - Threads: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 16961 |==================================================================== b . 16848 |==================================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_only - Threads: 768 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 16718 |==================================================================== b . 16736 |==================================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_write - Threads: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 125688 |=================================================================== b . 120550 |================================================================ MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_write_only - Threads: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 206145 |=================================================================== b . 163585 |===================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_write - Threads: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 73844 |======================================================== b . 89036 |==================================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_write - Threads: 768 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_write_only - Threads: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 213913 |=================================================================== b . 153471 |================================================ MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_write_only - Threads: 768 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 166357 |=============================================================== b . 177622 |=================================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_point_select - Threads: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 25236 |==================================================================== b . 24909 |=================================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_index - Threads: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 68422 |==================================================================== b . 54103 |====================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_point_select - Threads: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 24260 |=================================================================== b . 24448 |==================================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_point_select - Threads: 768 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 23180 |=================================================================== b . 23536 |==================================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_index - Threads: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 119718 |=================================================================== b . 98978 |======================================================= MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_index - Threads: 768 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 103448 |=================================================================== b . 96743 |=============================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_non_index - Threads: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 55705 |==================================================================== b . 40385 |================================================= MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_non_index - Threads: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 117854 |=================================================================== b . 110045 |=============================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_non_index - Threads: 768 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 50894 |=============================== b . 108525 |=================================================================== MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 79 |======================================================================= b . 68 |============================================================= MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 1024 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 7 |======================================================================== b . 7 |======================================================================== Timed Mesa Compilation 24.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 16.53 |==================================================================== b . 16.38 |=================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 46.92 |=================================================================== b . 47.27 |==================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: Junkshop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 66.05 |=================================================================== b . 66.69 |==================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 122.94 |=================================================================== b . 123.00 |=================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 56.74 |=================================================================== b . 57.21 |==================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 451.14 |=================================================================== b . 453.43 |=================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 144.93 |=================================================================== b . 144.76 |===================================================================