c5.2xlarge amazon testing on Amazon Linux 2 via the Phoronix Test Suite. c5.2xlarge: Processor: Intel Xeon Platinum 8275CL (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Amazon EC2 c5.2xlarge (1.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 1 x 16384 MB DDR4-2933MT/s, Disk: 107GB Amazon Elastic Block Store, Network: Amazon Elastic OS: Amazon Linux 2, Kernel: 5.10.214-202.855.amzn2.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 7.3.1 20180712, File-System: xfs, System Layer: amazon MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 4904.29 |========================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 4807.46 |========================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 4856.69 |========================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 4821.72 |========================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 4915.68 |========================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 4816.54 |========================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 4807.88 |========================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 5115.69 |========================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 6851.51 |========================================================= CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 45463.76 |======================================================== CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 64763.71 |======================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 1217377050 |====================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 1360641167 |====================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 1094.6 |========================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 71542.0 |========================================================= OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: ChaCha20 byte/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 20084168477 |===================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 22117343230 |===================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 16104247937 |===================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 byte/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 10325685522 |===================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 80.10 |=========================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 77.43 |=========================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 3363.05 |========================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 3357.20 |========================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 309.07 |========================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 313.21 |========================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 388.72 |========================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 385.28 |========================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 120.58 |========================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 121.07 |========================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 MiB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 659.23 |========================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 655.96 |========================================================== libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.1.0 Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 155.57 |========================================================== Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better c5.2xlarge . 27.91 |=========================================================== Stockfish 16.1 Chess Benchmark Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better c5.2xlarge . 4893920 |========================================================= C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better c5.2xlarge . 207.56 |========================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Atol Seconds < Lower Is Better c5.2xlarge . 81.42 |=========================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Ctype Seconds < Lower Is Better c5.2xlarge . 37.41 |=========================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Math Library Seconds < Lower Is Better c5.2xlarge . 488.82 |========================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Random Numbers Seconds < Lower Is Better c5.2xlarge . 1232.95 |========================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Vector Seconds < Lower Is Better c5.2xlarge . 102.99 |========================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Function Objects Seconds < Lower Is Better c5.2xlarge . 17.70 |=========================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Abstraction Seconds < Lower Is Better c5.2xlarge . 40.77 |===========================================================