epyc iotdb tests for a future article.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2309176-NE-EPYCIOTDB40 a Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xa10113eJava Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.20+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu1)Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Mitigation of safe RET + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
b Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 9684X 96-Core @ 2.55GHz (192 Cores / 384 Threads), Motherboard: AMD Titanite_4G (RTI1007B BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14a4, Memory: 1520GB, Disk: 3201GB Micron_7450_MTFDKCC3T2TFS, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe
OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.5.1-060501-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 640x480
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a b 16 32 48 64 80 70.12 74.07 MAX: 22513.29 MAX: 23733.51
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a b 10M 20M 30M 40M 50M 46308594 47603306
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a b 20 40 60 80 100 90.70 88.78 MAX: 23733.33 MAX: 22457.43
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b 14M 28M 42M 56M 70M 61651569 63071533
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b 20 40 60 80 100 109.12 105.51 MAX: 23747.05 MAX: 21805.6
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a b 9 18 27 36 45 40.01 40.15 MAX: 10141.78 MAX: 8866.2
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 a b 30 60 90 120 150 153.84 155.10 MAX: 29772.39 MAX: 29088.86
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a b 16M 32M 48M 64M 80M 76522166 71183704
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a b 14 28 42 56 70 58.71 63.49 MAX: 8903.31 MAX: 8961.96
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 a b 16M 32M 48M 64M 80M 73059243 72016503
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 a b 50 100 150 200 250 224.23 228.96 MAX: 29107.89 MAX: 30148.02
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M 88200705 86999010
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b 20 40 60 80 100 83.96 84.71 MAX: 10156.8 MAX: 8973.19
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 a b 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M 86663275 87472660
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 a b 70 140 210 280 350 312.48 296.37 MAX: 32869.03 MAX: 30054.05
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a b 12M 24M 36M 48M 60M 55416244 56492659
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a b 8 16 24 32 40 33.35 32.73 MAX: 23498.05 MAX: 22515.58
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 a b 13M 26M 39M 52M 65M 60196313 59555067
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 a b 30 60 90 120 150 118.25 118.34 MAX: 29808.72 MAX: 29095.72
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a b 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M 94149176 84574956
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a b 13 26 39 52 65 49.99 55.89 MAX: 22446.3 MAX: 22448.41
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 a b 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M 88203627 94350119
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 a b 50 100 150 200 250 208.40 193.49 MAX: 29422.5 MAX: 30197.78
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M 99400496 101866715
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b 20 40 60 80 100 76.59 74.48 MAX: 22456.27 MAX: 22432.47
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 a b 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M 113507815 99737871
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 a b 60 120 180 240 300 261.38 298.39 MAX: 30771.68 MAX: 31315.35
a Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xa10113eJava Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.20+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu1)Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Mitigation of safe RET + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 17 September 2023 15:21 by user phoronix.
b Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 9684X 96-Core @ 2.55GHz (192 Cores / 384 Threads), Motherboard: AMD Titanite_4G (RTI1007B BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14a4, Memory: 1520GB, Disk: 3201GB Micron_7450_MTFDKCC3T2TFS, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe
OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.5.1-060501-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 640x480
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xa10113eJava Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.20+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu1)Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Mitigation of safe RET + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 17 September 2023 15:54 by user phoronix.