lfld AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core testing with a ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (1802 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core @ 3.70GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (1802 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 4 x 16GB DDR4-3600MT/s Corsair CMT64GX4M4Z3600C16, Disk: Samsung SSD 980 PRO 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB (1750/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.5.0-25-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 DRM 3.54), Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 b: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core @ 3.70GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (1802 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 4 x 16GB DDR4-3600MT/s Corsair CMT64GX4M4Z3600C16, Disk: Samsung SSD 980 PRO 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB (1750/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.5.0-25-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 DRM 3.54), Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 c: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core @ 3.70GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (1802 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 4 x 16GB DDR4-3600MT/s Corsair CMT64GX4M4Z3600C16, Disk: Samsung SSD 980 PRO 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB (1750/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.5.0-25-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 DRM 3.54), Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Live FPS > Higher Is Better a . 192.88 |=================================================================== b . 190.36 |================================================================== c . 191.03 |================================================================== FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live FPS > Higher Is Better a . 68.63 |==================================================================== b . 67.94 |=================================================================== c . 67.71 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Upload FPS > Higher Is Better a . 12.31 |==================================================================== b . 12.27 |==================================================================== c . 12.33 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload FPS > Higher Is Better a . 13.56 |==================================================================== b . 13.56 |==================================================================== c . 13.53 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Platform FPS > Higher Is Better a . 46.41 |==================================================================== b . 46.37 |==================================================================== c . 46.47 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform FPS > Higher Is Better a . 28.17 |==================================================================== b . 28.05 |==================================================================== c . 28.09 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Video On Demand FPS > Higher Is Better a . 46.43 |==================================================================== b . 46.53 |==================================================================== c . 46.51 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand FPS > Higher Is Better a . 28.14 |==================================================================== b . 28.05 |==================================================================== c . 28.03 |==================================================================== x265 3.6 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 24.55 |==================================================================== b . 24.39 |==================================================================== c . 24.45 |==================================================================== x265 3.6 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 45.31 |==================================================================== b . 45.57 |==================================================================== c . 45.00 |=================================================================== Stockfish 16.1 Chess Benchmark Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 60626388 |================================================================= b . 59422978 |================================================================ c . 57142188 |============================================================= Timed FFmpeg Compilation 7.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 31.10 |==================================================================== b . 30.83 |=================================================================== c . 30.95 |==================================================================== Timed Mesa Compilation 24.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 15.85 |==================================================================== b . 15.80 |==================================================================== c . 15.75 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 36.04 |==================================================================== b . 34.83 |================================================================== c . 35.36 |=================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 14.10 |==================================================================== b . 14.03 |==================================================================== c . 13.98 |=================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 30.34 |==================================================================== b . 30.16 |=================================================================== c . 30.56 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 30.43 |==================================================================== b . 29.44 |================================================================== c . 30.14 |=================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 30.09 |==================================================================== b . 29.73 |=================================================================== c . 30.14 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 11.69 |==================================================================== b . 11.70 |==================================================================== c . 11.72 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 11.66 |==================================================================== b . 11.56 |=================================================================== c . 11.52 |=================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 11.53 |==================================================================== b . 11.54 |==================================================================== c . 11.47 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 7.82 |===================================================================== b . 7.75 |==================================================================== c . 7.73 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 5.94 |===================================================================== b . 5.96 |===================================================================== c . 5.93 |===================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 5.93 |===================================================================== b . 5.90 |===================================================================== c . 5.90 |===================================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 5.92 |===================================================================== b . 5.92 |===================================================================== c . 5.94 |===================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 9.37 |===================================================================== b . 9.28 |==================================================================== c . 9.34 |===================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 59.39 |==================================================================== b . 59.16 |==================================================================== c . 58.03 |================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 77.71 |==================================================================== b . 76.70 |=================================================================== c . 76.07 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 99.75 |=================================================================== b . 99.54 |=================================================================== c . 100.26 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 11.17 |==================================================================== b . 11.18 |==================================================================== c . 11.09 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 7.58 |===================================================================== b . 7.60 |===================================================================== c . 7.46 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 131.52 |=================================================================== b . 131.69 |=================================================================== c . 131.83 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 47.61 |==================================================================== b . 47.95 |==================================================================== c . 47.32 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 13.31 |==================================================================== b . 13.40 |==================================================================== c . 13.14 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 51.17 |=================================================================== b . 51.37 |=================================================================== c . 51.87 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 13.95 |=================================================================== b . 14.07 |==================================================================== c . 13.93 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 52.21 |==================================================================== b . 51.43 |=================================================================== c . 51.79 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 14.01 |==================================================================== b . 14.02 |==================================================================== c . 14.07 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 51.24 |==================================================================== b . 51.10 |==================================================================== c . 50.99 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 15.29 |==================================================================== b . 15.26 |==================================================================== c . 15.32 |==================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 42.71 |==================================================================== b . 42.62 |==================================================================== c . 42.52 |==================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: Junkshop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 63.19 |=================================================================== b . 63.60 |==================================================================== c . 64.00 |==================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 115.60 |================================================================== b . 116.23 |=================================================================== c . 116.67 |=================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 53.41 |=================================================================== b . 53.48 |=================================================================== c . 53.89 |==================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 440.72 |=================================================================== b . 443.49 |=================================================================== c . 440.39 |=================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 135.10 |=================================================================== b . 135.77 |=================================================================== c . 135.16 |=================================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Overwrite Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 382834 |=================================================================== b . 379919 |================================================================== c . 382424 |=================================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 384236 |=================================================================== b . 384641 |=================================================================== c . 382241 |=================================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 122971162 |=============================================================== b . 122722305 |=============================================================== c . 125016375 |================================================================ RocksDB 9.0 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 535854 |================================================================== b . 545830 |=================================================================== c . 545086 |=================================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 391130 |=================================================================== b . 391156 |=================================================================== c . 390464 |=================================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 5689 |===================================================================== b . 5637 |==================================================================== c . 5511 |=================================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 6378204 |================================================================== b . 6342025 |================================================================== c . 6326219 |================================================================= RocksDB 9.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 3157205 |================================================================== b . 3170105 |================================================================== c . 3162012 |================================================================== Llamafile 0.7 Test: llava-v1.5-7b-q4 - Acceleration: CPU Tokens Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 15.70 |==================================================================== b . 15.79 |==================================================================== c . 15.70 |==================================================================== Llamafile 0.7 Test: mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2.Q8_0 - Acceleration: CPU Tokens Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 10.33 |=================================================================== b . 10.42 |==================================================================== c . 10.35 |==================================================================== Llamafile 0.7 Test: wizardcoder-python-34b-v1.0.Q6_K - Acceleration: CPU Tokens Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3.05 |===================================================================== b . 3.06 |===================================================================== c . 3.05 |===================================================================== BRL-CAD 7.38.2 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better a . 520682 |=================================================================== b . 522046 |=================================================================== c . 518977 |===================================================================